Mark’s gospel tells the story of Jesus trying to get away from the crowd, only to be confronted by an unnamed woman. Jesus had just finished arguing with the religious leaders about what makes a person clean or unclean, a discussion prompted by their righteous anger at the disciples for not washing their hands before eating. He tells them it’s not the outside, it’s the inside that matters. The Syrophoenician woman breaks into the story as one who shatters the silence imposed by those in power. The woman is unnamed because, as a woman and a gentile, she’s an outsider. To make matters worse, her daughter is demon possessed. The world of the religious leaders refused to make room for her. She has no power, no voice, and no one willing to take up her cause. So, she takes matters into her own hands. According to Mark’s gospel, “She begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter”—a request Jesus declined. “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” But she will not take no for an answer. She talks back, refusing to go away, she demands to be heard. “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”
This story is about voices silenced by the religious and political establishment. It’s about a woman, pushed to desperation, raising her voice in defiance. In speaking out, she moves Jesus to action, not only with the healing of her daughter, but in the way she pushes Jesus’ ministry into new territory. Walter Brueggemann summarizes it this way,
“Silence and tacit consensus always, without fail, protect privilege. That is why the privileged are characteristically silencers. Conversely, contesting speech characteristically exposes the ideological force of the silence and privilege and invites us to a fresh take on the reality of God’s world.” (Interrupting Silence: God’s Command to Speak Out)
The news yesterday morning began with President Trump’s mocking of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a woman who broke the oppressive silence that affects so many. The president of the United States, a man with power and privilege, tried to silence her by making fun of her suffering. This isn’t the first time—his war against immigrants and refugees has tried to silence the groans of the outsider, the poor, and those Jesus refers to as the “least of these” (Matthew 25). Life is more than biology; it is also dignity, health, and the opportunity to live free from sexual assault. The Christian responsibility to love and care for our neighbor means giving voice to those who are not heard, and it means standing up to those who try to silence people on the margins. It’s time for those who claim to be pro-life to speak up, to say “enough!”, and stand with those who have experienced abuse and oppression. It’s time to take our example from the Syrophoenician woman and refuse to be quiet—to refuse to back down from those who wield power and privilege. It’s time to raise our voices for freedom and for justice. This isn’t partisan politics—it’s the gospel.
I appreciate the sentiment, but what about Gods clear commands of being impartial in matters of justice? Partiality cannot be shown to the poor over the rich or the rich over the poor. Justice seeks the truth, agreed? So how do you uphold impartiality while at the same time giving a voice to the voiceless? Genuinely curious in your opinion.
Except, Jesus seems to make the distinction, does he not? Matthew 25? We’ve spiritualized the gospel in a way that erases any distinction.
Of course their is a distinction. God gives special attention to the vulnerable when the powerful do not. No argument there. I am not trying to spiritualize rich and poor. On the contrary, I’m talking about places like Exodus 23:3, Leviticus 19:15, Deut 1:17, etc. There is nothing spiritual about these commands to judge without partiality. God specifically says to not give favor to the poor over the rich or the rich over the poor (weak/strong, etc). Why? Because justice matters to God. Truth matters to God. 2 chapters before Matt 25 Jesus says the weightier matters of the law are justice, mercy, and faithfulness (Matt 23:23).
I am definitely not in favor of Trumps tactics and remarks about Mrs. Ford. But is there not a distinction between condemning how people have reacted to her, while also caring about the justice of the situation at large? It seems like you are making them one and the same.